NEWS/REPORTED CASES

Hakif Namani v. WCAB (A. Duie Pyle), 32 A.3d 850 (Pa. Comm. 2011)

This case adopted our argument that a claimant’s medical expert – just like an employer’s medical expert – cannot ignore prior judicial determinations in the presentation of their opinions as to disability. The case also speaks to the inappropriateness of attempts by claimants to re-litigate termination decisions without establishing solid proof of a change in the claimant’s condition.

RIGHT FIRM. RIGHT NOW. | CALL 610-640-4800

SCHEDULE A CONFIDENTIAL
CONSULTATION TODAY